Google Earth has found mysterious structures in Antarctica. Pyramids in Antarctica What scientists say
Researchers from America monitor it daily. Recently, thanks to the Google Earth online system, scientists were able to find new pyramids in Antarctica.
According to experts, on Google Earth maps it was possible to discover completely new ruins of a huge ancient pyramid, which scientists had not previously found.
It is reported that a giant shadow emerged from the ruins, which indicates that the remains of the pyramid are of large dimensions.
Now experts will have to study the remains of the pyramid in detail to determine when it was built. Let us recall that earlier researchers in Antarctica found ruins of ancient structures, as well as underground bases, which were even attributed to aliens.
Photographs were taken of the mysterious pyramids on Vinson's spine, the symmetry and location of which make scientists wonder about the natural origin of these buildings.
Ufologists have long promoted the idea that these structures are needed to send signals into space. Another version is more prosaic - these are indeed the remains of a citadel, which was built by some ancient civilization. An unknown people could have explored Antarctica at a time when it was not yet completely covered with snow.
According to rumors, an ancient civilization actually existed on the continent located in the southern part of the Earth many thousands of years ago. Thus, the Turkish admiral Piri Reis in 1513 drew up a map depicting Antarctica and the people who live there.
Everyone is accustomed to the picture shown to us, where Antarctica is continuous endless snow-covered expanses. And only near the coast, where during the warm period the coastal strip thaws, the beaches and partly the mountain ranges are exposed. And everything else lies, as we were told in geography lessons, under 2-3 km of ice. And according to official data, there are places up to 5 km. But it turns out, if you look in Google Earth, in the depths of the continent on the surface above the ice there are mountainous and rocky massifs, partially not covered with snow or ice.
The quality of satellite imagery of most mountain ranges is low. But there is one place with more or less high-quality photography:
Link to map
The map even contains photographs from the panoramio service. Coordinates: 80° 21" 35.12" S 81° 22" 12.86" W
It’s amazing that from under the thickness of the ice and snow these not at all low mountains rise. Maybe the thickness of the ice on the continent is not kilometers at all. If you remember the video and photo of the ice sliding into the ocean, then its height (estimated by eye) is a maximum of several hundred meters.
It is unusual to see mountains without snow in the interior of this continent. Airstrip at the foot of the mountains
Could these be traces of water erosion - when the continent was free of ice and there were comfortable temperatures?
Glacier off the coast of Antarctica. It cannot be said at all that the thickness of this ice is 2 km. But somehow no one talks about this or compares it.
And where are the kilometer-thick glaciers? There’s not even 30 meters here...
And they always show us this:
Maybe there is in mountain valleys such ice deposits. But on the plain, such thicknesses are not visible from photographs.
Scientists have one argument in estimating the age of the ice - we took cores and measured the number of rings on them (in their opinion, the winter-summer change). But we know that this method is fundamentally wrong: The Lost Squadron, 37,000 years old .
In Antarctica there is also this:
Coordinates of this object: 79° 58′ 12S 81° 56′ 24W
Let's get closer:
Link to map
Also nearby:
Link to map
Of course, these could be protruding peaks mountain range, and maybe mountains processed into a pyramid (by someone in ancient times). Otherwise, why do scientists have such interest in these places?
memocode in the article he even determined the direction and showed which past geographic pole the pyramid was oriented to:
This is from the pole shift hypothesis
There are also contenders for the pyramidal mountains in Antarctica near the coast:
Link
71° 56" 56.82" S 23° 20" 46.65" E . Height 1300 m. Link to map
Nearby is the ultra-modern Princess Elizabeth station:
Accident? Did the scientists like the place?
Stone "castle".
If, according to official data, the ice here is almost half a million years old, then why during this time such a harsh climate and glaciers did not erase these pointed rocks into sand? Or are these young mountains?
This is how the excursion to the snowy expanses of Antarctica turned out...
Everyone is accustomed to the picture shown to us, where Antarctica is continuous endless snow-covered expanses. And only near the coast, where during the warm period the coastal strip thaws, the beaches and partly the mountain ranges are exposed. And everything else lies, as we were told in geography lessons, under 2-3 km of ice.
And according to official data, there are places up to 5 km. But it turns out, if you look in Google Earth, in the depths of the continent on the surface above the ice there are mountainous and rocky massifs, partially not covered with snow or ice.
The quality of satellite imagery of most mountain ranges is low. But there is one place with more or less high-quality photography:
In Antarctica there is also this:
Coordinates of this object: 79° 58′ 12S 81° 56′ 24W
Let's get closer:
Link to map
Also nearby:
Link to map
Of course, these could be protruding peaks of a mountain range, or maybe mountains processed into a pyramid (by someone in ancient times). Otherwise, why do scientists have such interest in these places?
memocode in the article he even determined the direction and showed which past geographic pole the pyramid was oriented to:
This is from the pole shift hypothesis
There are also contenders for the pyramidal mountains in Antarctica near the coast:
Link
71° 56′ 56.82″ S 23° 20′ 46.65″ E . Height 1300 m. Link to map
Nearby is the ultra-modern Princess Elizabeth station:
Accident? Did the scientists like the place?
Stone "castle".
If, according to official data, the ice here is almost half a million years old, then why during this time such a harsh climate and glaciers did not erase these pointed rocks into sand? Or are these young mountains?
This is how the excursion to the snowy expanses of Antarctica turned out...
